ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2022
Text Analysis of Radiology Reports with Signs of Intracranial Hemorrhage on Brain CT Scans Using the Decision Tree Algorithm.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of an Ensemble of Machine Learning Models and the BERT Language Model for Analysis of Text Descriptions of Brain CT Reports to Determine the Presence of Intracranial Hemorrhage.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: The initial data is a download from the Unified Radiological Information Service of the Unified Medical Information and Analytical System (URIS UMIAS) containing 34,188 studies obtained by a non-contrast CT of the brain in 56 inpatient medical settings. Data analysis and preprocessing were carried out using NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit, version 3.6.5), a library for symbolic and statistical processing of natural language, and scikit-learn, a machine learning library containing tools for classification tasks. According to 14 selected ICH-related key words, as well as 33 stop-phrases with key words denoting absence of ICH, an automatic selection of the CT investigations and their subsequent expert verification were carried out. Two classes of investigations were formed based on the sample from 3980 protocol descriptions: containing descriptions of ICH and without them. The problem of binary classification was solved using the decision tree algorithm as a model. To evaluate the performance of the model, the CT investigations were divided randomly into samples in the ratio of 7:3. Of 3980 protocols, 2786 were assigned to the training data set, 1194 - to the test one. Results: According to the test results, the designed and trained algorithm in the binary classification of the CT reports "with signs of ICH" and "without signs of ICH" has shown sensitivity of 0.94, specificity of 0.88, F-score of 0.83. Conclusion: The developed and trained algorithm for the analysis of radiology reports has demonstrated high accuracy in relation to brain CT with signs of intracranial hemorrhage and can be used to solve binary classification problems and create appropriate data sets. However, it is limited by the need for manual revision of CT studies to ensure quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.