ReviewSAGE open medicine2023
Narrative review based on fingolimod therapy in pediatric MS.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early and active treatment with fingolimod for pediatric onset multiple sclerosis: the experience of an Italian pediatric center over the past 3 years.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Lymphopenia associated with sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) in multiple sclerosis: analysis of European pharmacovigilance data.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Article
- Age-Dependent Changes in Cytochrome P450 Abundance and Composition in Human Liver.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024Article
- Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis treatment: A practical review.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Review
- Dermatologic findings after initiation of fingolimod in patients with multiple sclerosis: A real-world experience of five-year follow-up.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The course of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and adult multiple sclerosis shows some clinical differences. The rate of having a second attack after the first clinical event is 80% in children and around 45% in adults but the time to the second event is similar in all age groups. The pediatric group usually has a more aggressive onset than adults. On the other hand, a higher rate of complete recovery is observed in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis after the first clinical event compared to the adult group. Despite a highly active initial disease course, pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis patients show a slower increase in disability than patients with adult-onset disease. This is thought to be due to greater remyelination capacity and plasticity of the developing brain. The management of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis includes safety issues as well as effective disease control. In the pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis group, similar to adult multiple sclerosis, injectable treatments have been used for many years with reasonable efficacy and safety. Since 2011, oral treatments and then infusion treatments have been approved and used effectively in adult multiple sclerosis and have gradually entered clinical use in the pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis group. However, clinical trials are fewer, smaller, and include shorter follow-up due to the much lower prevalence of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis than adult multiple sclerosis. This is particularly important in the era of recent disease-modifying treatments. This review of the literature presents existing data on the safety and efficacy of fingolimod, pointing to a relatively favorable profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.