Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181269›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2023

The Effects of Intermittent Diet Breaks during 25% Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Resistance-Trained Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Madelin R Siedler, Megan H Lewis, Eric T Trexler, Priscila Lamadrid, Brian J Waddell, Sarah F Bishop, Gillian SanFilippo, Kaitlin Callahan, David Mathas, Gianna F Mastrofini and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madelin R SiedlerExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Megan H LewisExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric T TrexlerExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Priscila LamadridExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Brian J WaddellExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Sarah F BishopExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Gillian SanFilippoExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Kaitlin CallahanExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
David MathasExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Gianna F MastrofiniExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Menno HenselmansThe International Scientific Research Foundation for Fitness and Nutrition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fredrik T VårvikThe International Scientific Research Foundation for Fitness and Nutrition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bill I CampbellExercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-3871
University of South Florida · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Agder · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and eating behaviors in resistance-trained females. Thirty-eight resistance-trained females (mean ± standard deviation age: 22.3 ± 4.2 years) were randomized to receive either six weeks of a continuous 25% reduction in energy intake (n = 18), or one week of energy balance after every two weeks of 25% energy restriction (eight weeks total; n = 20). Participants were instructed to ingest 1.8 g protein/kilogram bodyweight per day and completed three weekly supervised resistance training sessions throughout the intervention. There were no differences between groups for changes over time in body composition, resting metabolic rate, or seven of the eight measured eating behavior variables (p > 0.05). However, a significant group-by-time interaction for disinhibition (p < 0.01) from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire was observed, with values (± standard error) in the continuous group increasing from 4.91 ± 0.73 to 6.17 ± 0.71, while values in the intermittent group decreased from 6.80 ± 0.68 to 6.05 ± 0.68. Thus, diet breaks do not appear to induce improvements in body composition or metabolic rate in comparison with continuous energy restriction over six weeks of dieting, but may be employed for those who desire a short-term break from an energy-restricted diet without fear of fat regain. While diet breaks may reduce the impact of prolonged energy restriction on measures of disinhibition, they also require a longer time period that may be less appealing for some individuals.

Indexed as

fat massmetabolismmuscle massphysique enhancementweight loss

Identifiers

PMID37181269
PMCPMC10170537
OpenAlexW4320917253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.