Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181196›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Association between patient characteristics and dissatisfaction after cranial neurosurgery: A prospective observational study.

Archisha Wadhwa, V S Akash, Suparna Bharadwaj, N Gopalakrishna Kadarapura, Subhas K Konar, Shweta Naik, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Archisha WadhwaDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
V S AkashDepartment of Clinical Psychology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4447-0042
Suparna BharadwajDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
N Gopalakrishna KadarapuraDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Subhas K KonarDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shweta NaikDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kamath SriganeshDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sudhir VenkataramaiahDepartment of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patient satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of healthcare. It can improve treatment adherence and health outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence, predictive factors, and impact of post-operative patient dissatisfaction with perioperative care after cranial neurosurgery. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care academic university hospital. Adult patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery were assessed for satisfaction 24 h after surgery using a five-point scale. The data regarding patient characteristics that may predict dissatisfaction after surgery were collected along with ambulation time and hospital stay. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality of data. Univariate analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test and significant factors were entered into binary logistic regression model for identifying predictors. The level of significance was set at Results: Four hundred and ninety-six adult patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery were recruited into the study from September 2021 to June 2022. Data of 390 were analyzed. The incidence of patient dissatisfaction was 20.5%. On univariate analysis, literacy, economic status, pre-operative pain, and anxiety were associated with post-operative patient dissatisfaction. On logistic regression analysis, illiteracy, higher economic status, and no pre-operative anxiety were predictors of dissatisfaction. The patient dissatisfaction did not impact ambulation time or duration of hospital stay after the surgery. Conclusion: One in five patients reported dissatisfaction after cranial neurosurgery. Illiteracy, higher economic status, and no pre-operative anxiety were predictors of patient dissatisfaction. Dissatisfaction was not associated with delayed ambulation or hospital discharge.

Indexed as

Cranial neurosurgeryIncidenceOutcomePatient satisfactionPredictive factors

Identifiers

PMID37181196
PMCPMC10174114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.