ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice
Comparison of arterial spin labeling perfusion with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in Moyamoya disease.
Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Moyamoya disease (MMD) leads to frequent ischemic/hemorrhagic manifestations. Our aim was to compare findings of arterial spin labeling (ASL) with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion in patients of MMD. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed as MMD underwent magnetic resonance imaging with ASL and DSC perfusion sequences. Perfusion in bilateral anterior cerebral artery and middle cerebral artery territories at two levels (level of thalami and centrum semiovale) was graded as normal (score 1), or reduced (score 2) on DSC and ASL cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps by comparison with normal cerebellar perfusion. Time to peak (TTP) maps of DSC perfusion were also qualitatively scored as normal (score 1), or increased (score 2) similarly. Correlation between scores of ASL, CBF, DSC, CBF, and DSC, TTP maps was assessed by using Spearman's rank correlation. Results: Among the 34 patients, we did not find any significant correlation between the ASL CBF maps and DSC CBF maps (r = -0.028, Conclusion: ASL perfusion CBF maps do not match the DSC perfusion CBF maps and rather match the TTP maps of DSC perfusion. This is explained by inherent problems in estimation of CBF in these techniques because of delay in arrival of label (in ASL perfusion) or contrast bolus (in DSC perfusion) due to the presence of stenotic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.