Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37181146›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2023

Assessment of employee engagement in pharmaceutical care service at King Abdulaziz Medical City - Central region (KAMC): A cross-sectional study.

Saleh Alanazi, Saleh Dekhaela, Saad Obaidy, Fawziah Mutairi, Khalil Majid, Haya Mufrij, Asma Altoub, Hind Al Badali, Meshal Alshakrah, Tahani Al Sufian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saleh AlanaziPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh DekhaelaPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saad ObaidyPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fawziah MutairiPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalil MajidPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haya MufrijPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asma AltoubPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hind Al BadaliPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshal AlshakrahPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tahani Al SufianPharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Job engagement and satisfaction are crucial for any successful institution, in recent years, organizations around the globe have begun measuring the engagement level of employees in order to improve productivity and profitability. Employee engagement has the potential to significantly affect employee retention and loyalty. This study was conducted by the pharmacy-Quality Improvement Section to assess pharmacy staff engagement in KAMC-CR in 2019 and to develop a tool to be used as employee engagement key performance indicator (KPI). Aim: (1) Assessing employee engagement and satisfaction in the pharmacy Care services- central region. And (2) to develop a tool to be used as employee engagement Key Performance Indicator (KPI). Methods: This study was conducted at the Pharmaceutical Care Service at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) and King Abdullah Specialized Children Hospital (KASCH) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A validated survey was selected for the study and was then distributed via e-mail to the pharmacy staff by the quality pharmacy section in October-November 2019. The included participants were comprised of administrators, administrative assistants, clinical pharmacists, pharmacists, technicians, pharmacy aides, and pharmacy residents. There are 20 questions in the survey, and the answers were reported using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). The survey was composed of sections including demographic data, and section for staff engagement and rating of facility. Results: Participants in this study included 228 (54 %) employees out of a total of 420 employees. The mean health facility rating was 6.51 + 1.94 out of 10. As for the employee engagement, the mean score was 65.53 ± 13.84, and the engagement level was 24 (10.5%) had low level of engagement, 122 (53.5%) had moderate level of engagement, and 82 (36%) had high level of engagement. High level of engagement was reported among the studied sample. Employee engagement was significantly associated with occupation, work experience (p = 0.001), as well as rating of the facility (satisfaction) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Pharmaceutical care services participants overall average rate of the facility by pharmaceutical care services staff as a workplace is 6.5 out of 10. The Employees engagement improves employee performance and efficiency, which contribute to an organization's overall success.

Indexed as

Employee engagementHealth care facilityPatient safetyPharmacyQuality

Identifiers

PMID37181146
PMCPMC10172566
OpenAlexW4361248016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.