ArticleTranslational pediatrics2023
Association between incubator standards and newborn nosocomial infection with machine-learning prediction.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Newborns have a high incidence of nosocomial infection (NI). We conducted a logistic regression to analyze different incubator standards and other risk factors for newborn NI, which could better help clinical choice of incubator standard. Methods: Newborns with complete necessary clinical data were included. We collected the demographic and incubator data of 76 patients (40 uninfected and 36 infected) at the Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College. An analysis of variance, Pearson correlation matrix analysis, and logistic regression analysis were conducted to explore the different incubator standards and other risk factors for neonatal hospital infections. In addition, 4 machine-learning algorithms were used to predict neonatal hospital infections. Results: We found differences in the gestational age, incubator type, paternal age, and maternal age between the 2 groups. The correlation analysis only revealed a correlation between paternal age and maternal age. The logistic regression showed that gestational age [odds ratio (OR)= 0.77574, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.583513-0.996354] and the new standard incubator (OR =0.011639, 95% CI: 0.000958-0.067897) may be protective factors for infant infection during hospitalization. Among the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (DT) algorithms, XGBoost had the best performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Conclusions: We found early gestational age and incubator standards may be risk factors for the NIs of newborns, which might help clinicians to improve the health and safety standards for incubators. XGBoost can be used to predict newborn NIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.