ReviewTranslational pediatrics2023
Biological and structural phenotypes associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital heart disease.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- From toddler to school age: longitudinal motor and cognitive outcomes in children with critical congenital heart disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopment in congenital heart disease: a review of antenatal mechanisms and therapeutic potentials.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Congenital Heart Diseases and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: New Insights Through the DOHaD Hypothesis.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Review
- Psychiatric and Psychological Implications of Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neonatal Seizures: New Evidence, Classification, and Guidelines.Epilepsy currents · 2024Review
- Transcriptomics integrated with metabolomics reveals partial molecular mechanisms of nutritional risk and neurodevelopment in children with congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Individualized cortical gyrification in neonates with congenital heart disease.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Neuroimaging and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Among Individuals With Complex Congenital Heart Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) is recognised as one of the most common comorbidities in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and is associated with altered brain structure and growth throughout the life course. Causes and contributors underpinning the CHD and NDD paradigm are not fully understood, and likely include innate patient factors, such as genetic and epigenetic factors, prenatal haemodynamic consequences as a result of the heart defect, and factors affecting the fetal-placental-maternal environment, such as placental pathology, maternal diet, psychological stress and autoimmune disease. Additional postnatal factors, including the type and complexity of disease and other clinical factors such as prematurity, peri-operative factors and socioeconomic factors are also expected to play a role in determining the final presentation of the NDD. Despite significant advances in knowledge and strategies to optimise outcomes, the extent to which adverse neurodevelopment can be modified remains unknown. Understanding biological and structural phenotypes associated with NDD in CHD are vital for understanding disease mechanisms, which in turn will advance the development of effective intervention strategies for those at risk. This review article summarises our current knowledge surrounding biological, structural, and genetic contributors to NDD in CHD and describes avenues for future research; highlighting the need for translational studies that bridge the gap between basic science and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.