Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180992›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Whole-genome sequencing in clinically diagnosed Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease undiagnosed by whole-exome sequencing.

Young-Gon Kim, Hyemi Kwon, Jong-Ho Park, Soo Hyun Nam, Changhee Ha, Sunghwan Shin, Won Young Heo, Hye Jin Kim, Ki Wha Chung, Ja-Hyun Jang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genes · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spectrum of Hereditary Neuropathies in Adult Patients From Serbia.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Young-Gon KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6840-6830
Hyemi KwonDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Ho ParkClinical Genomics Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Soo Hyun NamCell and Gene Therapy Institute (CGTI), Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Changhee HaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Sunghwan ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Won Young HeoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Hye Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Ki Wha ChungDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kongju National University, Gongju 32588, South Korea.
Ja-Hyun JangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Won KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Ok ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRKongju National University · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing is the most comprehensive form of next-generation sequencing method. We aimed to assess the additional diagnostic yield of whole-genome sequencing in patients with clinically diagnosed Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease when compared with whole-exome sequencing, which has not been reported in the literature. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 72 families whose genetic cause of clinically diagnosed Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease was not revealed after the whole-exome sequencing and 17p12 duplication screening. Among the included families, 14 (19.4%) acquired genetic diagnoses that were compatible with their phenotypes. The most common factor that led to the additional diagnosis in the whole-genome sequencing was genotype-driven analysis (four families, 4/14), in which a wider range of genes, not limited to peripheral neuropathy-related genes, were analysed. Another four families acquired diagnosis due to the inherent advantage of whole-genome sequencing such as better coverage than the whole-exome sequencing (two families, 2/14), structural variants (one family, 1/14) and non-coding variants (one family, 1/14). In conclusion, an evident gain in diagnostic yield was obtained from whole-genome sequencing of the whole-exome sequencing-negative cases. A wide range of genes, not limited to inherited peripheral neuropathy-related genes, should be targeted during whole-genome sequencing.

Indexed as

Charcot–Marie–Tooth diseasegenotype-driven analysiswhole-exome sequencingwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37180992
PMCPMC10174204
OpenAlexW4367319006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.