ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
In vivo photothermal therapy monitored by multi-position calibrated photoacoustic thermometer.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ability of monitoring both temperature and photothermal agents, the photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a promising guiding tool for the photothermal therapy (PTT). The calibration line which depicts the relative variation of PA amplitude with the temperature should be obtained before using PA thermometer. In existing study, a calibration line was generated based on the data from one spatial position, and used in the whole region of interesting (ROI). However, the generalization of this calibration line in ROI was not verified, especially for ROI with heterogeneous tissues. Moreover, the relationship between the distributions of photothermal agents and effective treatment area is not clear, hindering using photothermal agents' distribution to optimize the administration-therapy interval. In this study, the distribution of effective photothermal agents and temperature in subcutaneously transplanted tumor mouse models were continuously monitored by 3D photoacoustic/ ultrasonic dual-modality imaging in 8 h after administration. With multiple micro-temperature probes in tumor and surrounding normal tissue, the PA thermometer was calibrated and evaluated at multiple spatial positions for the first time. The generalization in homologous tissue and tissue specificity in heterogeneous tissues of the PA thermometer calibration line were verified. Our study not only validated the effectivity of PA thermometer by proving the generalization of calibration line, but also removes a major obstacle that prevents applying the PA thermometer to a heterogeneous tissues ROI. The positive correlation between the proportion of effective treatment area and the proportion of effective photothermal agent area in the tumor was observed. Since the latter can be monitored with fast PA imaging, PA imaging can be employed as a convenient tool for seeking optimal administration-treatment interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.