ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2023
A Preliminary Study on the Correlation Between Age and Endometrial Receptivity.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individual-dependent molecular heterogeneity in human endometrial stromal cells: a potential determinant of female fertility.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Endometrial Aging and Reproductive Decline: The Central Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Factors influencing endometrial receptivity in women with recurrent implantation failure.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Linking the Warburg effect to endometrial receptivity: metabolic parallels in embryo implantation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Expression of Endometrial Receptivity Markers throughout the Menstrual Cycle in Women with and without Uterine Adenomyosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is well established that female fertility declines with age, primarily because of loss of ovarian function. However, few studies have clarified the relationship between increasing age and endometrial receptivity. Here, we aimed to study the impact of age on endometrial receptivity, meanwhile, we examined the expression of endometrial mesenchymal stem cell (eMSC) surface markers (CD146 and PDGF-Rβ), essential for endometrial development and re-growth, in different age groups. Methods: Participants were enrolled in this study between October 2020 and July 2021. All 31 patients were divided into three age groups; early (30-39 years old, n=10), intermediate (40-49 years old, n=12) and advanced (≥50 years old, n=9). We assessed localization and expression of CD146 and PDGF-Rβ by immunofluorescence and further analyzed selected endometrial receptivity markers (Homeobox A10 HOXA10, leukemia inhibitory factor LIF and osteopontin) and steroid hormone receptors by immunohistochemistry. Results: There were no significant differences in expression of HOXA10 and OPN (p>0.05) among the three groups. However, we found a significant difference in LIF expression between the early and advanced age groups, with higher expression noted in the latter group (p=0.02). Similarly, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were significantly increased (p=0.01 and p=0.01, respectively) in the advanced age group compared with the early age group. There were no significant difference in CD146 and PDGF-Rβ expression among the three groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that the age of the patient does not influence their endometrial receptivity. So, this study serves to increase our understanding of the impact of age and eMSCs on endometrial receptivity and expands the etiology of age-related infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.