Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180942›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

A review on the clean-up technologies for heavy metal ions contaminated soil samples.

Vikas Kumar, Chadetrik Rout, Joginder Singh, Yajvinder Saharan, Rohit Goyat, Ahmad Umar, Sheikh Akbar, S Baskoutas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vikas KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Chadetrik RoutDepartment of Civil Engineering, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Joginder SinghDepartment of Chemistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Yajvinder SaharanDepartment of Chemistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Rohit GoyatDepartment of Chemistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be University), Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Ahmad UmarDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Arts, And Promising Centre for Sensors and Electronic Devices (PCSED), Najran University, Najran-11001, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sheikh AkbarDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
S BaskoutasDepartment of Materials Science, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soil contamination with heavy metal ions is one of the grave intricacies faced worldwide over the last few decades by the virtue of rapid industrialization, human negligence and greed. Heavy metal ions are quite toxic even at low concentration a swell as non-biodegradable in nature. Their bioaccumulation in the human body leads to several chronic and persistent diseases such as lung cancer, nervous system break down, respiratory problems and renal damage etc. In addition to this, the increased concentration of these metal ions in soil, beyond the permissible limits, makes the soil unfit for further agricultural use. Hence it is our necessity, to monitor the concentration of these metal ions in the soil and water bodies and adopt some better technologies to eradicate them fully. From the literature survey, it was observed that three main types of techniques viz. physical, chemical, and biological were employed to harness the heavy metal ions from metal-polluted soil samples. The main goal of these techniques was the complete removal of the metal ions or the transformation of them into less hazardous and toxic forms. Further the selection of the remediation technology depends upon different factors such as process feasibility/mechanism of the process applied, nature and type of contaminants, type and content of the soil, etc. In this review article, we have studied in detail all the three technologies viz. physical, chemical and biological with their sub-parts, mechanism, pictures, advantages and disadvantages.

Indexed as

And feasibilityContaminated soilHeavy metal ionsLung cancerPermissible limitsRemediation technology

Identifiers

PMID37180942
PMCPMC10172878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.