ArticleData in brief2023
A dataset of occurrence of wild bees and their interaction with foraging plants along a livestock grazing gradient of northern Tanzania.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dataset describing the occurrence of wild bees and their interaction with forage plants along livestock grazing gradient is critical in understanding bee-plant interaction networks and in developing conservation plans to ensure ecosystem services in human-modified landscapes. Despite this need, bee-plant datasets are scarce in Africa, and Tanzania is no exception. Therefore, in this article, we present a dataset of wild bee species richness, occurrence, and distribution collected across sites with different levels of livestock grazing intensity and forage resources thereby. The data presented in this paper supports a research article by Lasway et al., 2022 describing the effects of grazing intensity on East African bee assemblages. The paper presents primary data on bee species, collection method, date of collection, bee family, identifier, plant forage resource, forage plant life form, forage plant family, location (GPS coordinates), grazing intensity category, mean annual temperature (°C), and elevation (m asl). The data were collected intermittently between August 2018 and March 2020 from 24 study sites distributed along three levels of livestock grazing intensity with eight replicates for each: low, moderate, and high livestock grazing intensity. In each study site, two 50 × 50 m study plots were set from which bees and floral resources were sampled and quantified. The two plots were placed in a way to capture the overall structural heterogeneity of the respective habitat by placing the two plots in contrasting microhabitats where possible. For example, in moderately livestock-grazed habitats, plots were placed on sites with and without tree or shrub cover to ensure representativeness. This paper presents a dataset comprising 2,691 bee individuals from 183 species representing 55 genera of the five bee families: Halictidae (74), Apidae (63), Megachilidae (40), Andrenidae (5), and Colletidae (1). In addition, the dataset comprises 112 species of flowering plants that were identified as potential forage resources for bees. This paper supplements rare but critical data on bee pollinators in Northern Tanzania and advances our knowledge of the potential drivers of bee-pollinator whose populations diversity are declining globally. The dataset will also promote collaborations among researchers who would wish to combine and extend their data for further analysis to gain a broader understanding of the phenomenon on a larger spatial scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.