Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180877›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

Metadata to describe the dataset on involved actors and their roles in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes.

Claudia Sattler, Rena Barghusen, Birte Bredemeier, Céline Dutilly, Katrin Prager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia SattlerLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working group: Governance of Ecosystem Services, Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg 15374, Germany.
Rena BarghusenLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working group: Governance of Ecosystem Services, Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg 15374, Germany.
Birte BredemeierInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, Hannover 30419, Germany.
Céline DutillyCIRAD, UMR MoISA, Montpellier F-34398, France.
Katrin PragerDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, Elphinstone Road, Aberdeen AB23 3UF, United Kingdom.
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DECentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRLeibniz University Hannover · DEUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agri-environmental and climate schemes are an important policy instrument in the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union to maintain biodiversity and safeguard ecosystem services provision for human wellbeing. In the presented dataset, we analyzed 19 innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes from six European countries, representing examples of four different contract types: result-based, collective, land tenure, and value chain contracts. Our analytical approach comprised three steps: In the first step, we used a method mix combining literature review, web search, and expert consultation to identify potential case examples for the innovative contracts. In the second step, we employed a survey, which was structured in accordance with Ostrom's institutional analysis and development framework to collect detailed information on each contract. The survey was either filled in by us authors, based on information retrieved from websites and other data sources, or by experts directly involved in the different contracts. Based on the collected data, in the third step, an in-depth analysis was conducted on the public, private, and civil actors involved from different governance levels (local, regional, national, or international) and the roles these actors perform in contract governance. The dataset generated through these three steps contains 84 data files, which includes tables, figures, maps, and a text file. The dataset can be re-used by all interested in result-based, collective, land tenure, and value chain contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Each contract is characterized in great detail by 34 variables making the dataset suitable for further institutional and governance analysis.

Indexed as

Governance actorsGovernance of ecosystem servicesGovernance tasksInstitutional analysisPayments for ecosystem services

Identifiers

PMID37180877
PMCPMC10172853
OpenAlexW4366163488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.