Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180840›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2023

The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on global influenza surveillance: Insights from 18 National Influenza Centers based on a survey conducted between November 2021 and March 2022.

Lisa Staadegaard, Marco Del Riccio, Sytske Wiegersma, Clotilde El Guerche-Séblain, Erica Dueger, Meral Akçay, Jean-Sebastien Casalegno, Michel Dückers, Saverio Caini, John Paget and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa StaadegaardNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-3541
Marco Del RiccioNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2742-0297
Sytske WiegersmaNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.
Clotilde El Guerche-SéblainSanofi, Global Medical Influenza Franchise Lyon France.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-4357
Erica DuegerSanofi, Global Medical Influenza Franchise Lyon France.
Meral AkçaySanofi, Global Medical Influenza Franchise Lyon France.
Jean-Sebastien CasalegnoNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3271-9856
Michel DückersNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-053X
Saverio CainiNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2262-1102
John PagetNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel) Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-2481
NIC Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: National Influenza Centers (NICs) have played a crucial role in the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2. The FluCov project, covering 22 countries, was initiated to monitor the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on influenza activity. Methods: This project consisted of an epidemiological bulletin and NIC survey. The survey, designed to assess the impact of the pandemic on the influenza surveillance system, was shared with 36 NICs located across 22 countries. NICs were invited to reply between November 2021 and March 2022. Results: We received 18 responses from NICs in 14 countries. Most NICs (76%) indicated that the number of samples tested for influenza decreased. Yet, many NICs (60%) were able to increase their laboratory testing capacity and the "robustness" (e.g., number of sentinel sites) (59%) of their surveillance systems. In addition, sample sources (e.g., hospital or outpatient setting) shifted. All NICs reported a higher burden of work following the onset of the pandemic, with some NICs hiring additional staff or partial outsourcing to other institutes or departments. Many NICs anticipate the future integration of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance into the existing respiratory surveillance system. Discussion: The survey shows the profound impact of SARS-CoV-2 on national influenza surveillance in the first 27 months of the pandemic. Surveillance activities were temporarily disrupted, whilst priority was given to SARS-CoV-2. However, most NICs have shown rapid adaptive capacity underlining the importance of strong national influenza surveillance systems. These developments have the potential to benefit global respiratory surveillance in the years to come; however, questions about sustainability remain.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesepidemicsinfluenzapublic healthSARS‐CoV‐2surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37180840
PMCPMC10173050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.