Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180742›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2023

Time trends in atrial fibrillation-related stroke during 2001-2020 in Sweden: a nationwide, observational study.

Mozhu Ding, Marcus Ebeling, Louise Ziegler, Alexandra Wennberg, Karin Modig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hospitalization trends for thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation: A 12-year national analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mozhu DingUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus EbelingUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Louise ZieglerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexandra WennbergUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin ModigUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Great efforts have been made to improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Meanwhile, incidence of AF is increasing, which may affect the share of AF-related stroke on all strokes. We aimed to examine the temporal trends in the incidence of AF-related ischemic stroke between 2001 and 2020, if it varied by use of novel oral anticoagulant drugs (NOAC), and if the relative risk of ischemic stroke associated with AF changed over time. Methods: Data from the total Swedish population aged ≥70 years during the period 2001-2020 were used. Annual incidence rate (IR) was calculated for overall and AF-related ischemic stroke which was defined as first-ever ischemic stroke with AF diagnosed up to 5 years before, on the same day, or within 2 months after the stroke event. Cox regression models were performed to examine if the hazard ratio (HR) between AF and stroke changed over time. Findings: While IR of ischemic strokes declined during 2001-2020, IR of AF-related ischemic stroke remained stable between 2001 and 2010 but showed a consistent decline between 2010 and 2020. The HR of ischemic stroke within 3 years from an AF diagnosis came down from 2.39 (95% confidence interval: 2.31-2.48) to 1.54 (1.48-1.61) over the study period, which was largely explained by a substantial increase in the use of NOAC among AF patients after 2012. Yet, by the end of 2020, 24% of all ischemic strokes had a preceding or concurrent AF diagnosis, which is slightly higher than in 2001. Interpretation: Even though both the absolute and relative risk of AF-related ischemic stroke declined over the past 20 years, every fourth ischemic stroke in 2020 still had a preceding or concurrent AF diagnosis. This represents a great potential for future gains in stroke prevention among AF patients. Funding: Swedish Research Council and Loo and Hans Osterman Foundation for Medical Research.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCohort studiesIschemic strokeOral anticoagulant drugsTime trends

Identifiers

PMID37180742
PMCPMC10173271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.