ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
Characteristics and survival analysis of breast cancer survivors with metachronous double primary cancers: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of patients stricken with double primary breast and ovarian cancer based on the SEER database.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Risk of second primary cancer in young breast cancer survivors: an important yet overlooked issue.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Risk Factors and Prognostic Implications in Synchronous Breast-Thyroid Dual Primary Cancers: A Matched Case-Control Study.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in females, and its incidence has increased dramatically recently. Clinical studies have shown that BC patients are developing double primary cancers more frequently than by chance, and the prognosis has changed greatly. Previous articles rarely mentioned metachronous double primary cancers in BC survivors. Thus, further analysis of the clinical characteristics and survival differences may provide valuable information in BC survivors. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 639 cases of double primary cancers in BC patients. Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses of clinical factors of overall survival (OS) were performed in patients with double primary cancers when breast cancer was the primary tumor to assess the correlation between clinical factors and OS in these patients with double primary cancers. Results: Among the double primary cancer patients, BC was the most frequent first primary cancer. In terms of numbers, thyroid cancer was the most common type of double primary cancer among BC survivors. Patients had a younger median age when BC occurred as the first primary cancer rather than the second primary cancer. The total mean time interval between the onset of double primary tumors was 70.8 months. With the exception of the thyroid and cervical cancer, the incidence of second primary tumors was <60% within 5 years. However, the incidence was >60% within 10 years. The mean OS of double primary cancer patients was 109.8 months. Additionally, patients who had thyroid cancer as their second primary cancer had the highest 5-year survival rate, followed by cervical, colon, and endometrial cancer, while patients who had lung cancer as their second primary cancer had the lowest 5-year survival rate. OS risk of BC survivors with second primary cancers was significantly associated with age, menopause status, family history, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Conclusions: The identification of double primary cancers in earlier stages could play a critical role in guidance and lead to better outcomes. A prolonged follow-up examination period for BC survivors is needed to provide better guidance and treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.