ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Corneal Biomechanical Changes after Corneal Cross-Linking in Patients with Keratoconus.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal biomechanical property changes following corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.International ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- A novel corneal indentation device for comparison of corneal tangent modulus before and after FS-LASIK in vivo.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- [Controllability and predictability of riboflavin-ultraviolet A collagen cross-linking: advances in experimental techniques and theoretical research].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Influence of Dextran Solution and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters Evaluated by Corvis ST In Vitro.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Standard and accelerated crosslinking protocols in keratoconus - differences and evolution at one year.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea using the Corvis ST device after the treatment of keratoconus patients with ultraviolet-A/riboflavin corneal cross-linking (CXL). Methods: Thirty-seven eyes from 37 consecutive patients with progressive keratoconus were included in this prospective observational case series. Corneal biomechanical parameters including the length of the applanated cornea (L1 and L2), corneal movement velocity during applanation (V1 and V2) at the moment of the first and second applanation, deformation amplitude (DA), distance between bending points of the cornea points of the cornea (PD), and concave radius of curvature (R) at the point of the highest concavity were recorded using the Corvis ST at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year after CXL. Results: The mean age of the patients was 23.27 years (range, 19-31 years). Among CorVis ST corneal biomechanical parameters, L1, DA, PD, and R at the point of the highest concavity did not change significantly. The length of the applanated cornea at the moment of second applanation (L2) showed a significant change 3 months after CXL, but no significant difference was found between the 3-month and 1-year values of this parameter. Corneal movement velocity during applanation (V1 and V2) did not change 3 months after doing CXL, but the changes in these parameters were significant 1 year after CXL. Conclusions: Although the CorVis ST device may detect changes in some biomechanical properties of cornea after the treatment of keratoconus patients with CXL, many parameters remain unchanged, and this device cannot readily be used to find the effects of CXL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.