Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179982›Full record

ReviewSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2022

Trends in Population-Based Studies: Molecular and Digital Epidemiology (Review).

N S Denisov, E M Kamenskikh, O S Fedorova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N S DenisovAssistant, Research and Educational Laboratory "Live Laboratory of Population-Based Studies"; Siberian State Medical University, 2 Moskovsky Trakt, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
E M KamenskikhHead of the Research and Educational Laboratory "Live Laboratory of Population-Based Studies"; Siberian State Medical University, 2 Moskovsky Trakt, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.
O S FedorovaProfessor, Head of Department of Faculty Pediatrics with the Course of Childhood Diseases, Faculty of General Medicine; Siberian State Medical University, 2 Moskovsky Trakt, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of high-throughput technologies has sharply increased the opportunities to research the human body at the molecular, cellular, and organismal levels in the last decade. Rapid progress in biotechnology has caused a paradigm shift in population-based studies. Advances in modern biomedical sciences, including genomic, genome-wide, post-genomic research and bioinformatics, have contributed to the emergence of molecular epidemiology focused on the study of the personalized molecular mechanism of disease development and its extrapolation to the population level. The work of research teams at the intersection of information technology and medicine has become the basis for highlighting digital epidemiology, the important tools of which are machine learning, the ability to work with real world data, and accumulated big data. The developed approaches accelerate the process of collecting and processing biomedical data, testing new scientific hypotheses. However, new methods are still in their infancy, they require testing of application under various conditions, as well as standardization. This review highlights the role of omics and digital technologies in population-based studies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMolecular EpidemiologyResearchdigital epidemiologyinformation technologiesmolecular epidemiologyomics technologiespopulation-based studies in medicine

Identifiers

PMID37179982
PMCPMC10171044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.