ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Improving visualization of free fibula flap perforators and reducing radiation dose in dual-energy CT angiography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Visualization of Peroneal Artery Perforators Prior to Autologous Transplantation in Head and Neck Surgery by Dual-Energy CTA and Semiautomatic Vessel Unfolding.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced three-dimensional visualization reconstruction for perforator flaps: A case series on clinical applications and outcomes.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Application value of dual-energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic images for pediatric hand angiography.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions Derived from Dual-Energy CTA Scans in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Comparison with True Non-Contrast Images and Impact on Radiation Dose.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The precise assessment of the perforators of the fibula free flap (FFF) is crucial for minimizing procedure-related complications when harvesting the FFF in patients with maxillofacial lesions. This study aims to investigate the utility of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images for radiation dose saving and to determine the optimal energy level of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) reconstructions in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for visualization of the perforators of the fibula free flap (FFF). Methods: Data from 40 patients with maxillofacial lesions who received lower extremity DECT examinations in the noncontrast and arterial phase were collected in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. To compare VNC images from the arterial phase with true non-contrast images in a DECT protocol (M_0.5-TNC) and to compare VMI images with 0.5 linear images blending from the arterial phase (M_0.5-C), the attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality were assessed in different arteries, muscles, and fat tissues. Two readers evaluated the image quality and visualization of the perforators. The dose-length product (DLP) and CT volume dose index (CTDIvol) were used to determine the radiation dose. Results: Objective and subjective analyses showed no significant difference between the M_0.5-TNC and VNC images in the arteries and muscles (P>0.09 to P>0.99), and VNC imaging could reduce 50% of the radiation dose (P<0.001). Compared with those of the M_0.5-C images, the attenuation and CNR of VMI reconstructions at 40 kiloelectron volt (keV) and 60 keV were higher (P<0.001 to P=0.04). Noise was similar at 60 keV (all P>0.99) and increased at 40 keV (all P<0.001), and the SNR in arteries was increased at 60 keV (P<0.001 to P=0.02) in VMI reconstructions compared with those in the M_0.5-C images. The subjective scores in VMI reconstructions at 40 and 60 keV was higher than those in M_0.5-C images (all P<0.001). The image quality at 60 keV was superior to that at 40 keV (P<0.001), and there was no difference in the visualization of the perforators between 40 and 60 keV (P=0.31). Conclusions: VNC imaging is a reliable technique for replacing M_0.5-TNC and provides radiation dose saving. The image quality of the 40-keV and 60-keV VMI reconstructions was higher than that of the M_0.5-C images, and 60 keV provided the best assessment of perforators in the tibia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.