Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179905›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Multiregional radiomic model for breast cancer diagnosis: value of ultrasound-based peritumoral and parenchymal radiomics.

Suping Guo, Xingzhi Huang, Chao Xu, Meiqin Yu, Yaohui Li, Zhenghua Wu, Aiyun Zhou, Pan Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suping Guo *Department of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xingzhi Huang *Department of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chao XuDepartment of Ultrasonography, Jiangxi Tumor Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Meiqin YuDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yaohui LiDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhenghua WuDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Aiyun ZhouDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Pan XuDepartment of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CNJiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer consists not only of neoplastic cells but also of significant changes in the surrounding and parenchymal stroma, which can be reflected in radiomics. This study aimed to perform breast lesion classification through an ultrasound-based multiregional (intratumoral, peritumoral, and parenchymal) radiomic model. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound images of breast lesions from institution #1 (n=485) and institution #2 (n=106). Radiomic features were extracted from different regions (intratumoral, peritumoral, and ipsilateral breast parenchymal) and selected to train the random forest classifier with the training cohort (n=339, a subset of the institution #1 dataset). Then, the intratumoral, peritumoral, and parenchymal, intratumoral & peritumoral (In&Peri), intratumoral & parenchymal (In&P), and intratumoral & peritumoral & parenchymal (In&Peri&P) models were developed and validated on the internal (n=146, another subset of institution 1) and external (n=106, institution #2 dataset) test cohorts. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). Calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test assessed calibration. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was used to assess performance improvement. Results: The performance of the In&Peri (AUC values 0.892 and 0.866), In&P (0.866 and 0.863), and In&Peri&P (0.929 and 0.911) models was significantly better than that of the intratumoral model (0.849 and 0.838) in the internal and external test cohorts (IDI test, all P<0.05). The intratumoral, In&Peri and In&Peri&P models showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, all P>0.05). The multiregional (In&Peri&P) model had the highest discrimination among the 6 radiomic models in the test cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The multiregional model combining radiomic information of intratumoral, peritumoral, and ipsilateral parenchymal regions yielded better performance than the intratumoral model in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from benign lesions.

Indexed as

Breast cancermachine learningradiomicsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37179905
PMCPMC10167447
OpenAlexW4328003564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.