Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Perception of disease, dyadic coping, and the quality of life of oncology patients in the active treatment phase and their life partners: an approach based on the actor-partner interdependence model.

Adelina Mihaela Ştefănuţ, Mona Vintilă, Larisa Maria Bădău, Daciana Grujic, Cristina Marinela Oprean, Cosmin Goian, Paul Sârbescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Illness perception and intimate relationships in patients with cervical cancer: the mediating role of dyadic coping.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adelina Mihaela ŞtefănuţDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Mona VintilăDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Larisa Maria BădăuHygiene Department, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Daciana GrujicDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Cristina Marinela OpreanMorpho-pathology Department, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania.
Cosmin GoianDepartment of Social Assistance, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Paul SârbescuDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
West University of Timişoara · ROVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study based on the Systemic Transactional Model was to examine the relationship between dyadic coping and (1) disease perception and (2) quality of life of a sample of cancer patients and their life partners. Method: This cross-sectional study included 138 oncological dyads. The following questionnaires were used: Stress Appraisal Measure, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. Data collected was analysed by applying the actor-partner interdependence model. Results: The perception of the disease as a threat as well as its centrality significantly negatively influences the positive forms of dyadic coping whilst the perception of the disease as a challenge has a significant positive influence on them. Dyadic coping does not influence symptoms but has significant influences on global health/quality of life. Conclusion: This study has highlighted new information regarding how couples cope with cancer. The results encourage the inclusion of the perception of the disease and dyadic coping in interventions that aim to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and their life partners.

Indexed as

APIMcancerdyadic copingillness appraisalQoLquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37179865
PMCPMC10172643
OpenAlexW4367183824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.