Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179842›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health reports2021

Identifying the priority infection prevention and control gaps contributing to neonatal healthcare-associated infections in low-and middle-income countries: results from a modified Delphi process.

Daiva Yee, Hanako Osuka, Jamine Weiss, Jane Kriengkauykiat, Amy Kolwaite, Julia Johnson, Joost Hopman, Susan Coffin, Pavani Ram, Florina Serbanescu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daiva YeeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hanako OsukaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Chenega Professional and Technical Services, Chesapeake, Virginia, USA.
Jamine WeissCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jane KriengkauykiatCalifornia Department of Public Health, California, USA.
Amy KolwaiteCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Julia JohnsonJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joost HopmanRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Susan CoffinChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pavani RamUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Florina SerbanescuCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Benjamin ParkCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USJohns Hopkins University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), neonatal healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and costs. When resources are limited, addressing HAI through infection prevention and control (IPC) requires prioritizing interventions to maximize impact. However, little is known about the gaps in LMIC that contribute most to HAI. Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify the leading IPC gaps contributing to neonatal HAIs in intensive care units and specialty care wards in LMIC. Additionally, a panel of 21 global experts in neonatology and IPC participated in an in-person modified Delphi process to achieve consensus on the relative importance of these gaps as contributors to HAI. Results: Thirteen IPC gaps were identified and summarized into four main categories: facility policies such as prioritizing a patient safety culture and maintaining facility capacity, general healthcare worker behaviors such as hand hygiene and proper device insertion and maintenance, specialty healthcare worker behaviors such as cleaning and reprocessing of medical equipment, and infrastructural considerations such as adequate medical equipment and hand hygiene supplies. Conclusions: Through a modified Delphi process, we identified the leading IPC gaps contributing to neonatal HAIs; this information can assist policymakers, public health officials, researchers, and clinicians to prioritize areas for further study or intervention.

Indexed as

delphi processhealthcare-associated infectionsinfection prevention and controllow- and middle-income countriesneonatal sepsispatient safety

Identifiers

PMID37179842
PMCPMC10174223
OpenAlexW3186629614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.