ArticleRadiology case reports2023
Sudden aortic dissection: A cautionary tale for the unexplained back pain during bevacizumab treatment.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer complicated by abdominal aortic aneurysm and mural thrombus: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bevacizumab is widely used in the treatment of colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and other advanced solid tumors because of its multiple targets, no genetic testing and better safety. Globally, the use of bevacizumab in the clinic has been climbing year by year based on several large-scale, multicenter prospective studies. While bevacizumab undeniably has a good clinical safety profile, it has also been associated with adverse effects such as drug-related hypertension and anaphylaxis. In our recent clinical work, we met a female patient with acute aortic coarctation previously treated with multiple cycles of bevacizumab, who was admitted with sudden onset of back pain. Because the patient had just had an enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen a month earlier, no abnormal lesions apparently associated with low back pain were found. So when the patient was seen on this occasion, our clinical diagnosis was first considered to be neuropathic pain, but a further multiphase enhancement CT was done again for further exclusion and the final diagnosis was acute aortic dissection. The patient later died within 1 hour after the chest pain had worsened again while waiting for a surgical blood supply within 72 hours of presentation. The risk of fatal acute aortic dissection is not sufficiently emphasized in the revised instructions for bevacizumab, although the adverse effects associated with aortic dissection and aneurysm are mentioned. Our report is of high practical value in raising clinicians' vigilance and safe management of patients using bevacizumab worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.