ArticleJournal of transport & health2019
Sampling Methodology and Reliability of a Representative Walkability Audit.
Article in Journal of transport & health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Physical inactivity is a public health concern in the US Virgin Islands (USVI). A contributing factor may be a lack of pedestrian infrastructure and other environmental supports for walking. In this manuscript, we describe the methods used to conduct a walkability audit of environmental features related to physical activity in the USVI. Methods: In 2016, volunteer auditors conducted the audit using a modified version of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes tool. A two-stage sampling method was developed using publicly available census data to select a sample of estates (n=46) and street segments (n=1,550; 99.2 km) across the USVI. A subset of segments was audited by two independent auditors, and inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa and percent agreement. Results: Audits were completed on 1,114 segments (94.6 km), and estimates were weighted to represent accessible public street length in the study area (1,155.9 km). Most items on the audit tool (62.7%) demonstrated good to excellent reliability. We found that it was feasible to conduct a reliable audit of environmental features related to physical activity across a large sample of streets in the USVI. Conclusions: These methods can be replicated in other settings to collect comprehensive data that can be used to guide strategies to improve the walkability of communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.