Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179519›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Assessing the validity and responsiveness of a generic preference quality of life measure in the context of posttraumatic stress disorder.

Sheradyn R Matthews, Marja Elizabeth, Larissa N Roberts, Billingsley Kaambwa, Tracey D Wade, Reginald D V Nixon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheradyn R MatthewsCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-5572
Marja ElizabethCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Larissa N RobertsCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Billingsley KaambwaCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, P.O Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Tracey D WadeFlinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, P.O Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Reginald D V NixonFlinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, P.O Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. reg.nixon@flinders.edu.au.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is limited research exploring the usefulness of generic preference-based quality of life (GPQoL) measures used to facilitate economic evaluation in the context of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The aim of the current study was to explore the validity and responsiveness of a common GPQoL measure (Assessment of Quality of Life 8 Dimension [AQoL-8D]) in relation to a PTSD condition-specific outcome measure (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5 [PCL-5]).

methodThis aim was investigated in a sample of individuals (N = 147) who received trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder. Convergent validity was investigated using spearman's correlations, and the level of agreement was investigated using Bland-Altman plots. Responsiveness was investigated by exploring the standardised response means (SRM) from pre-post-treatment across the two measures, which allow the comparison of the magnitude of change between the measures over time.

resultsCorrelations between the AQoL-8D (dimensions, utility and summary total scores) and the PCL-5 total score ranged from small to large and agreement between the measures was considered moderate to good. While SRMs were large for the AQoL-8D and PCL-5 total scores, the SRM for the PCL-5 was nearly double that of the AQoL-8D.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the AQoL-8D has good construct validity but present preliminary evidence that economic evaluations using only GPQoL measures may not fully capture the effectiveness of PTSD treatments.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticData AccuracyHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAQoL-8DPCL-5PTSDResponsivenessValidity

Identifiers

PMID37179519
PMCPMC10474197
OpenAlexW4376598332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.