Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179511›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023

The development and validation of a global advanced development framework for the pharmacy workforce: a four-stage multi-methods approach.

Sherly Meilianti, Kirsten Galbraith, Lina Bader, Arit Udoh, Desak Ernawati, Ian Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sherly MeiliantiInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands. sherly@fip.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-0428
Kirsten GalbraithInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-8307
Lina BaderInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-7962
Arit UdohInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-4843
Desak ErnawatiInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-5429
Ian BatesInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, Andries Bickerweg 5, 2517 JP, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-5171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have indicated that a generalisable and translatable global framework is a useful tool for supporting career progression and recognising advanced practice.

aimTo develop and validate a global advanced competency development framework as a tool to advance the pharmacy profession globally.

methodA four-stage multi-methods approach was adopted. In sequence, this comprised an assessment of initial content and a cultural validation of the advanced level framework. Following this, we conducted a transnational modified Delphi followed by an online survey sampling the global pharmacy leadership community. Finally, a series of case studies was constructed exemplifying the framework implementation.

resultsInitial validation resulted in a modified draft competency framework comprising 34 developmental competencies across six clusters. Each competency has three phases of advancement to support practitioner progression. The modified Delphi stage provided feedback on framework modifications related to cultural issues, including missing competencies and framework comprehensiveness. External engagement and case study stages provided further validity on the framework implementation and dissemination.

conclusionThe four-staged approach demonstrated transnational validation of a global advanced competency framework as a mapping and development tool for the pharmacy professions. Further study is needed to develop a global glossary of terminologies on advanced and specialist practice. Also, developing an accompanying professional recognition system and education and training programmes to support framework implementation is recommended.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmaciesPharmacyHumansPharmacistsWorkforceAdvancing practiceCompetency-based educationCompetency frameworkInternational Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)Pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID37179511
PMCPMC10366019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.