Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179445›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Immune landscape of breast tumors with low and intermediate estrogen receptor expression.

Leonie Voorwerk, Joyce Sanders, Milou S Keusters, Sara Balduzzi, Sten Cornelissen, Maxime Duijst, Esther H Lips, Gabe S Sonke, Sabine C Linn, Hugo M Horlings and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Special Issue "Breast Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapies".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leonie VoorwerkDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joyce SandersDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-7813
Milou S KeustersDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sara BalduzziDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-1895
Sten CornelissenCore Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maxime DuijstDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther H LipsDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-4935
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-0347
Hugo M HorlingsDivision of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-8828
Marleen KokDivision of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.kok@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9043-9815

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) NKI2015-7542Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) NWO-VIDI 09150172010043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is currently approved for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), whereas responses to ICB are also observed in a small subgroup of Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The cut-off for ER-positivity (≥1%) is based on likelihood of endocrine treatment response, but ER-positive breast cancer represents a very heterogeneous group. This raises the question whether selection based on ER-negativity should be revisited to select patients for ICB treatment in the context of clinical trials. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and other immune parameters are higher in TNBC compared to ER-positive breast cancer, but it is unknown whether lower ER levels are associated with more inflamed tumor microenvironments (TME). We collected a consecutive series of primary tumors from 173 HER2-negative breast cancer patients, enriched for tumors with ER expression between 1 and 99% and found levels of stromal TILs, CD8 + T cells, and PD-L1 positivity in breast tumors with ER 1-9% and ER 10-50% to be comparable to tumors with ER 0%. Expression of immune-related gene signatures in tumors with ER 1-9% and ER 10-50% was comparable to ER 0%, and higher than in tumors with ER 51-99% and ER 100%. Our results suggest that the immune landscape of ER low tumors (1-9%) and ER intermediate tumors (10-50%) mimic that of primary TNBC.

Identifiers

PMID37179445
PMCPMC10182974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.