ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparison of conventional and unconventional obesity indices associated with new-onset hypertension in different sex and age populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and sex-specific predictive performance of obesity indices for hypertension in the Persian (Shahedieh) cohort study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- A clinically practical aging clock (physical clock) for healthy aging: development, validation, and application for health assessment and intervention.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Observational
- Evaluating and comparing the predictive ability with hypertension risk among obesity indicators: a prospective cohort integrating Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Impact of Mediterranean Diet Adherence on the Incidence of New-Onset Hypertension in Adults With Obesity in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to compare the relationship between hypertension and obesity-related anthropometric indices (waist circumference [WC], waist-height ratio, waist-hip ratio [WHR], and body mass index; unconventional: new body shape index [ABSI] and body roundness index [BRI]) to identify best predictors of new-onset hypertension. The study included 4123 adult participants (2377 women). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using a Cox regression model to estimate the risk of new-onset hypertension with respect to each obesity index. In addition, we assessed the predictive value of each obesity index for new-onset hypertension using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) after adjusting for common risk factors. During the median follow-up of 2.59 years, 818 (19.8%) new hypertension cases were diagnosed. The non-traditional obesity indices BRI and ABSI had predictive value for new-onset hypertension; however, they were not better than the traditional indexes. WHR was the best predictor of new-onset hypertension in women aged ≤ 60 and > 60 years, with HRs of 2.38 and 2.51 and AUCs of 0.793 and 0.716. However, WHR (HR 2.28, AUC = 0.759) and WC (HR 3.24, AUC = 0.788) were the best indexes for predicting new-onset hypertension in men aged ≤ 60 and > 60 years, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.