ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023
Anatomic considerations of inflatable penile prosthetics: lessons gleaned from surgical body donor workshops.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical steps and relevant anatomical landmarks for the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placed in the retropubic and submuscular abdominal ("ectopic") space.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- The space of Retzius: anatomy, imaging features, and patterns of disease spread.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Comment on: Reservoir placement and surgical considerations: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- The sensory penis: A comprehensive immunohistological and ontogenetic exploration of human penile innervation.Andrology · 2026Article
- Penile prosthesis implantation following conservative surgical treatment for penile cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- How to improve functional outcome of inflatable penile implant surgery? a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Management of tunica albuginea disruption secondary to malleable penile implant fracture: insights into etiology and surgical approach.Basic and clinical andrology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) remains the gold-standard treatment for severe erectile dysfunction. The ideal surgical technique requires a thorough understanding of the relevant anatomy. This includes anatomic considerations related to, but not limited to, dissection and exposure of penoscrotal fasciae and tissues, corporal configuration, and abdominal structures. Insights obtained from pre-dissected anatomic specimens can obviate urethral injury, nerve damage, corporal perforation, inappropriate sizing, crossover, or implant malposition. We present penile implant-specific anatomic dissections and topographic landmarks identified over the last decade in the course of surgical training programs provided for IPP implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.