ArticleScientific reports2023
Clinical spectrum and prognosis of pathologically confirmed atypical tumefactive demyelinating lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biopsy-proven tumefactive demyelinating lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Non-Syndromic Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesions in the Pediatric Population: Four Case Reports and Review of the Literature.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- Subgroup analysis of tumefactive demyelinating lesions: clinical, imaging features and outcomes.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the clinical spectrum and prognosis of atypical tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs), which were confirmed by pathology. A total of 11 patients were diagnosed with atypical TDLs confirmed by brain biopsy and surgery between January 2006 and December 2017. The clinical spectrum and prognosis in these patients were analyzed. The patients' ages ranged from 29 to 62 years, with a mean age of 48.9 years; 72.7% were males. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of the patients with first onset was 2.36. Most of the patients started with limb numbness and weakness (45.5%) or alalia (27.2%). The mean time from symptom onset to biopsy or surgery was 12.9 days (3-30 days). Most of the patients had solitary lesions (72.7%), supratentorial lesions (90.9%, particularly predominant in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes), moderate edema (63.6%), mild mass effect (54.5%), and patchy lesions (54.5%). Among them, three patients were positive for myelin basic protein (MBP) and one patient was positive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). The patients were followed up for an average of 6.9 years (2-14 years), and recurrent TDLs were observed in 2 patients. Except for the 2 patients who relapsed, only 1 of the 9 patients died; the other 8 patients improved or maintained the status quo (the EDSS scores were lower or unchanged). The patients did not have any serious nervous system injury at onset, and the main presentation included extremity weakness, headache or dizziness, and alalia. The most common form was patchy on MRI enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid and demyelination test can be an indicator of TDLs, and seizures may be a poor prognostic indicator. Most atypical TDLs have monophasic courses and good outcomes. The effect of neurosurgery alone was good in our group, and the effect of surgery on atypical TDLs can be further studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.