Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179321›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2023

Comparative proteomic analysis of glomerular proteins in IgA nephropathy and IgA vasculitis with nephritis.

Hajime Kaga, Hirotoshi Matsumura, Ayano Saito, Masaya Saito, Fumito Abe, Takehiro Suzuki, Naoshi Dohmae, Masafumi Odaka, Atsushi Komatsuda, Hideki Wakui and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hajime KagaDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hirotoshi MatsumuraDepartment of Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, Akita, Japan. matsumuh@gipc.akita-u.ac.jp.
Ayano SaitoDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Masaya SaitoDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Fumito AbeDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Takehiro SuzukiBiomolecular Characterization Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Japan.
Naoshi DohmaeBiomolecular Characterization Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Japan.
Masafumi OdakaDepartment of Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Atsushi KomatsudaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ogachi Central Hospital, Yuzawa, Japan.
Hideki WakuiEmeritus Professor, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Naoto TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Akita University · JPRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIgA nephropathy (IgAN) and IgA vasculitis with nephritis (IgAVN) are related glomerular diseases characterized by marked similarities in immunological and histological findings. We herein performed a comparative proteomic analysis of glomerular proteins in IgAN and IgAVN.

methodsWe used renal biopsy specimens from 6 IgAN patients without nephrotic syndrome (NS) (IgAN-I subgroup), 6 IgAN patients with NS (IgAN-II subgroup), 6 IgAVN patients with 0-8.0% of glomeruli with crescent formation (IgAVN-I subgroup), 6 IgAVN patients with 21.2-44.8% of glomeruli with crescent formation (IgAVN-II subgroup), 9 IgAVN patients without NS (IgAVN-III subgroup), 3 IgAVN patients with NS (IgAN-IV subgroup), and 5 control cases. Proteins were extracted from laser microdissected glomeruli and analyzed using mass spectrometry. The relative abundance of proteins was compared between groups. An immunohistochemical validation study was also performed.

resultsMore than 850 proteins with high confidence were identified. A principal component analysis revealed a clear separation between IgAN and IgAVN patients and control cases. In further analyses, 546 proteins that were matched with ≥ 2 peptides were selected. The levels of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM), complements (C3, C4A, C5, and C9), complement factor H-related proteins (CFHR) 1 and 5, vitronectin, fibrinogen chains, and transforming growth factor-β inducible gene-h3 were higher (> 2.6 fold) in the IgAN and IgAVN subgroups than in the control group, whereas hornerin levels were lower (< 0.3 fold). Furthermore, C9 and CFHR1 levels were significantly higher in the IgAN group than in the IgAVN group. The abundance of some podocyte-associated proteins and glomerular basement membrane (GBM) proteins was significantly less in the IgAN-II subgroup than in the IgAN-I subgroup as well as in the IgAVN-IV subgroup than in the IgAVN-III subgroup. Among the IgAN and IgAVN subgroups, talin 1 was not detected in the IgAN-II subgroup. This result was supported by immunohistochemical findings.

conclusionsThe present results suggest shared molecular mechanisms for glomerular injury in IgAN and IgAVN, except for enhanced glomerular complement activation in IgAN. Differences in the protein abundance of podocyte-associated and GBM proteins between IgAN and IgAVN patients with and without NS may be associated with the severity of proteinuria.

Indexed as

Comparative proteomic analysisGlomerular proteinsIgA nephropathyIgA vasculitis with nephritisMass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID37179321
PMCPMC10182656
OpenAlexW4376504083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.