Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179312›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

Improving multi-scale detection layers in the deep learning network for wheat spike detection based on interpretive analysis.

Jiawei Yan, Jianqing Zhao, Yucheng Cai, Suwan Wang, Xiaolei Qiu, Xia Yao, Yongchao Tian, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Xiaohu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiawei Yan *National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jianqing Zhao *National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yucheng CaiNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Suwan WangNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xiaolei QiuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xia YaoNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yongchao TianNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yan ZhuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Weixing CaoNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xiaohu ZhangNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. zhangxiaohu@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetecting and counting wheat spikes is essential for predicting and measuring wheat yield. However, current wheat spike detection researches often directly apply the new network structure. There are few studies that can combine the prior knowledge of wheat spike size characteristics to design a suitable wheat spike detection model. It remains unclear whether the complex detection layers of the network play their intended role.

resultsThis study proposes an interpretive analysis method for quantitatively evaluating the role of three-scale detection layers in a deep learning-based wheat spike detection model. The attention scores in each detection layer of the YOLOv5 network are calculated using the Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) algorithm, which compares the prior labeled wheat spike bounding boxes with the attention areas of the network. By refining the multi-scale detection layers using the attention scores, a better wheat spike detection network is obtained. The experiments on the Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset show that the large-scale detection layer performs poorly, while the medium-scale detection layer performs best among the three-scale detection layers. Consequently, the large-scale detection layer is removed, a micro-scale detection layer is added, and the feature extraction ability in the medium-scale detection layer is enhanced. The refined model increases the detection accuracy and reduces the network complexity by decreasing the network parameters.

conclusionThe proposed interpretive analysis method to evaluate the contribution of different detection layers in the wheat spike detection network and provide a correct network improvement scheme. The findings of this study will offer a useful reference for future applications of deep network refinement in this field.

Indexed as

Attention scoreDeep learning networkInterpretive analysisWheat spike detection

Identifiers

PMID37179312
PMCPMC10183117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.