Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179257›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Software-assisted preoperative planning of S1 Alar Iliac screws: a 3D morphometric and anatomical study.

Payman Vahedi, Ghazal Shabakhsh, Faeze Monji

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. S2AI revision surgery - biomechanical evaluation of increased screw diameters.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Feasibility and intra-operative accuracy of robotic-guided stacked S1AI and S2AI screw placement.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Payman VahediDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tehran Medical Branch, Farhikhtegan Hospital, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. payman.vahedi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-6476
Ghazal ShabakhshTehran Medical Branch, Bou-Ali Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Faeze MonjiTehran Medical Branch, Bou-Ali Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences 162363916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeS1 alar iliac (S1AI) trajectory has gained popularity as a salvage technique for revision surgeries and failed constructs in the lumbopelvic region. This study aims to investigate the morphometry of this new trajectory based on 3D models. The possible role of gender, ethnicity and view angle (surgeon's vs. radiologist's) was investigated.

methodsComputed tomography-driven virtual 3D models of spinopelvic region were created applying Materialize MIMICS software, and assessed for coronal and sagittal radiographic versus surgeon's view angles, and morphometry of the screw trajectory. Independent-samples t test was used to analyze the results. P value was set at <  = 0.05. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software (SPSS version 24.0) was used for the statistical analysis.

resultsA total of 164 3D models were simulated with a total 328 screws inserted satisfactorily within the S1AI trajectory. S1AI instrumentation was feasible in 96.48%. The mean radiological coronal angle was 50.619' ± 8.590' and the mean coronal angle for surgeons' perspective was 10.263' ± 5.860'. The mean radiological and surgeon's perspective sagittal angles were found to be 44.532' ± 6.424' and 31.164' ± 5.455', respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between anatomical and surgeon's perspective trajectories. Neither the pelvic laterality nor the gender influence the screw angles, length and diameter in radiological versus surgeon's view angles.

conclusionPreoperative 3D modeling would be an invaluable adjunct to increase the accuracy of S1AI screw placement. Surgeon's perspective of the trajectory differs from standard CT sections and should be considered in preoperative planning.

Indexed as

IliumSacrumBone ScrewsHumansPelvisSoftwareAnatomicalLumbopelvic fusionMorphometricS1AIS1 alar iliac

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.