Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179225›Full record

ReviewClinical breast cancer2023

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Current Understanding and Future Directions.

Alexandra Thomas, Emily Douglas, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Metin N Gurcan, Hannah Y Wen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rat somatic genome editing enables ER+ breast cancer modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra ThomasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. Electronic address: althomas@wakehealth.edu.
Emily DouglasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Metin N GurcanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Hannah Y WenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Wake Forest University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Polθ to Overcome PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Homologous Recombination Deficient Breast CancerP50CA247749 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Simon N. Powell · 2020 to 2026
$16.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA247749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metaplastic breast cancers (MBC) encompass a group of highly heterogeneous tumors which share the ability to differentiate into squamous, mesenchymal or neuroectodermal components. While often termed rare breast tumors, given the relatively high prevalence of breast cancer, they are seen with some frequency. Depending upon the definition applied, MBC represents 0.2% to 1% of breast cancers diagnosed in the United States. Less is known about the epidemiology of MBC globally, though a growing number of reports are providing information on this. These tumors are often more advanced at presentation relative to breast cancer broadly. While more indolent subtypes exist, the majority of MBC subtypes are associated with inferior survival. MBC is most commonly of triple-negative phenotype. In less common hormone receptor positive MBCs, hormone receptor status appears not to be prognostic. In contrast, relatively rare HER2-positive MBCs are associated with superior outcomes. Multiple potentially targetable molecular features are overrepresented in MBC including DNA repair deficiency signatures and PIK3/AKT/mTOR and WNT pathways alterations. Data on the prevalence of targets for novel antibody-drug conjugates is also emerging. While chemotherapy appears to be less active in MBC than in other breast cancer subtypes, efficacy is seen in some MBCs. Disease-specific trials, as well as reports of exceptional responses, may provide clues for novel approaches to this often hard-to-treat breast cancer. Strategies which harness newer research tools, such as large data and artificial intelligence hold the promise of overcoming historic barriers to the study of uncommon tumors and could markedly advance disease-specific understanding in MBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansPrognosisWnt Signaling PathwayBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerDigital pathologyMetaplasticRareSpindle cell

Identifiers

PMID37179225
PMCPMC10584986
OpenAlexW4366438809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.