Observational studyIndian heart journal
Long-term clinical outcomes after kissing balloon inflation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with provisional stenting technique. Results from the real-world multicenter registry.
Observational study in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- OCT for Optimizing Long-Term Clinical Results in Left Main PCI-Dream or Reality? Results from a Single-Center High-Volume Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere is a lack of data regarding the long-term clinical efficacy of the kissing balloon inflation (KBI) after provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of KBI on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing provisional stenting for the coronary bifurcation lesions in a large real-world population.
methodsA total of 873 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with provisional stenting and had clinical follow up were analyzed. Patients treated with 2-stent strategy were excluded. To reduce the effect of potential confounding factors in this observational study, propensity score matching was conducted.
resultsKBI was performed in 325 patients (37.2%). The median follow-up duration was 37.3 months. Patients treated with KBI more often had a previous PCI (48.6% vs. 42.5% SMD = 0.123). Patients in non-kissing group had more complex coronary disease with higher prevalence of calcification (14.8% vs. 21.4% SMD = 0.172), thrombosis (2.8% vs. 5.8% SMD = 0.152) and longer side branch lesions (8.3% vs. 11.7% SMD = 0.113). There were no significant differences in the major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization after KBI versus no KBI (15.4% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.28), in total cohort or in matched patients (17.1% vs. 15.8%, adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.65, p = 0.95). The lack of effect of KBI on clinical outcomes was consistent across various subgroups including left main disease.
conclusionIn this multicenter real-world registry, KBI did not improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with provisional stenting technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.