Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37178456›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2023

Concurrent and Prospective Associations Between Communicated Emotional Arousal and Adjustment Among Couples Coping With Cancer.

Danielle M Weber, Brian R W Baucom, Donald H Baucom, Melanie S Fischer, Katherine Ramos, Joan M Romano, Laura S Porter, Shelby L Langer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle M WeberDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6387-6128
Brian R W BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Donald H BaucomDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Melanie S FischerInstitute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katherine RamosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Joan M RomanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Laura S PorterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Shelby L LangerCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USArizona State University · USHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Couple Communication in Cancer: A Multi-Method Examination - Renewal - 1R01CA201179 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Shelby Langer, LAURA S PORTER · 2016 to 2026
$7.2M
A Patient-Caregiver Behavioral Intervention for Older Adults with Cancer and Mild Cognitive ImpairmentK08CA258947 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Ramos · 2022 to 2026
$809k
NCI NIH HHS CA201179NCI NIH HHS K08 CA258947NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience of cancer can create considerable emotional distress for patients and their committed partners. How couples communicate about cancer-related concerns can have important implications for adjustment. However, past research has primarily utilized cross-sectional designs and retrospective self-reports of couple communication. While informative, little is known about how patients and partners express emotion during conversations about cancer, and how these emotional patterns predict individual and relational adjustment. PURPOSE: The current investigation examined how patterns of emotional arousal within couples' communication about cancer was associated with concurrent and prospective individual psychological and relational adjustment.

methodsAt baseline, 133 patients with stage II- breast, lung, or colorectal cancer and their partners completed a conversation about a cancer-related concern. Vocally expressed emotional arousal (f0) was extracted from recorded conversations. Couples completed self-report measures of individual psychological and relational adjustment at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 months later.

resultsCouples who started the conversation higher in f0 (i.e., greater emotional arousal) reported better individual and relational adjustment at baseline. If the non-cancer partner had lower f0 relative to patients, this predicted worse individual adjustment across follow-up. Additionally, couples who maintained their level of f0 rather than decreasing later in the conversation reported improvements in individual adjustment across follow-up.

conclusionsElevated emotional arousal within a cancer-related conversation may be adaptive for adjustment, as it may reflect greater emotional engagement and processing of an important topic. These results may suggest ways for therapists to guide emotional engagement to enhance resilience in couples experiencing cancer.

Indexed as

ArousalCommunicationEmotional AdjustmentExpressed EmotionFamily CharacteristicsFamily RelationsNeoplasmsAdultAgedFamily SupportFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedResilience, PsychologicalAdjustmentCancerCommunicationCouplesEmotional arousalLongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID37178456
PMCPMC10441863
OpenAlexW4376504278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.