ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2023
Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles from Different Stem Cells in Chronic Wound Healing.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and artificial nanovesicles: a translational framework for cell-free wound repair.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for Vascular Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-extracellular vesicle engineering delivery system: a promising therapeutic strategy for wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Extracellular Vesicles: Promises and Pitfalls.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells: A potential therapeutic strategy for diabetic foot ulcers.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Advancements in engineered exosomes for wound repair: current research and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing has long been a complex problem, especially in chronic wounds. Although debridement, skin grafting, and antimicrobial dressings have been used to treat chronic wounds, their treatment period is long, expensive, and has specific rejection reactions. The poor treatment results of traditional methods have caused psychological stress to patients and a substantial economic burden to society. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale vesicles secreted by cells. They play an essential role in intercellular communication. Numerous studies have confirmed that stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (SC-EVs) can inhibit overactive inflammation, induce angiogenesis, promote re-epithelization, and reduce scar formation. Therefore, SC-EVs are expected to be a novel cell-free strategy for chronic wound treatment. We first summarize the pathological factors that hinder wound healing and discuss how SC-EVs accelerate chronic wound repair. And then, we also compare the advantages and disadvantages of different SC-EVs for chronic wound treatment. Finally, we discuss the limitations of SC-EVs usage and provide new thoughts for future SC-EVs research in chronic wound treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37178227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.