Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37178195›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2023

Strategies to avoid mastectomy skin-flap necrosis during nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Tracy-Ann Moo, Jonas A Nelson, Varadan Sevilimedu, Jillian Charyn, Tiana V Le, Robert J Allen, Babak J Mehrara, Andrea V Barrio, Deborah M Capko, Melissa Pilewskie and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Perioperative management of direct-to-implant-based breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients and West China Hospital experiences].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy-Ann MooBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jonas A NelsonPlastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Varadan SevilimeduBiostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jillian CharynBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Tiana V LeBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Robert J AllenPlastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Babak J MehraraPlastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrea V BarrioBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Deborah M CapkoBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Melissa PilewskieBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Alexandra S HeerdtBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Audree B TadrosBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mary L GemignaniBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-5973
Monica MorrowBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Virgilio SacchiniBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-9111
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy is associated with a higher risk of mastectomy skin-flap necrosis than conventional skin-sparing mastectomy. There are limited prospective data examining modifiable intraoperative factors that contribute to skin-flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

methodsData on consecutive patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy between April 2018 and December 2020 were recorded prospectively. Relevant intraoperative variables were documented by both breast and plastic surgeons at the time of surgery. The presence and extent of nipple and/or skin-flap necrosis was documented at the first postoperative visit. Necrosis treatment and outcome was documented at 8-10 weeks after surgery. The association of clinical and intraoperative variables with nipple and skin-flap necrosis was analysed, and significant variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection.

resultsSome 299 patients underwent 515 nipple-sparing mastectomies (54.8 per cent (282 of 515) prophylactic, 45.2 per cent therapeutic). Overall, 23.3 per cent of breasts (120 of 515) developed nipple or skin-flap necrosis; 45.8 per cent of these (55 of 120) had nipple necrosis only. Among 120 breasts with necrosis, 22.5 per cent had superficial, 60.8 per cent had partial, and 16.7 per cent had full-thickness necrosis. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant modifiable intraoperative predictors of necrosis included sacrificing the second intercostal perforator (P = 0.006), greater tissue expander fill volume (P < 0.001), and non-lateral inframammary fold incision placement (P = 0.003).

conclusionModifiable intraoperative factors that may decrease the likelihood of necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy include incision placement in the lateral inframammary fold, preserving the second intercostal perforating vessel, and minimizing tissue expander fill volume.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyMastectomy, SubcutaneousFemaleHumansMastectomyNecrosisNipplesPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37178195
PMCPMC10517092
OpenAlexW4376505562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.