Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37178160›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Breast carcinoma detection in ex vivo fresh human breast surgical specimens using a fast slide-free confocal microscopy scanner: HIBISCUSS project.

Angelica Conversano, Muriel Abbaci, Paul van Diest, Aurélie Roulot, Giuseppe Falco, Malek Ferchiou, Saverio Coiro, Milan Richir, Pierre-Michel Genolet, Carine Clement and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04976556 (Breast Carcinoma Detection in Ex-vivo Fresh Breast Surgical Specimens Using the Histolog Scanner, Slide-free Confocal Microscopy Scanner), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04976556 completednot on this map

Breast Carcinoma Detection in Ex-vivo Fresh Breast Surgical Specimens Using the Histolog Scanner, Slide-free Confocal Microscopy Scanner

TypeobservationalSponsorSamanTree Medical SARan2019 to 2021Enrolled181ConditionsBreast CancerArmsHistolog Scanner
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast tissue imaging atlas using ultra-fast confocal microscopy to identify cancer lesions.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Virtual Staining of Nonfixed Tissue Histology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelica ConversanoGustave Roussy, Département de Chirurgie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-1720
Muriel AbbaciGustave Roussy, Plate-forme Imagerie et Cytométrie, UMS 23/3655, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8408-8868
Paul van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aurélie RoulotGustave Roussy, Département de Chirurgie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Giuseppe FalcoDepartment of Oncology and Advanced Technologies, Breast Surgery Unit, IRCSS Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Malek FerchiouGustave Roussy, Département de pathologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Saverio CoiroDepartment of Oncology and Advanced Technologies, Breast Surgery Unit, IRCSS Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Milan RichirDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, TheNetherlands.
Pierre-Michel GenoletEspacegyneco, Pully, Switzerland.
Carine ClementEspacegyneco, Pully, Switzerland.
Odile CasiraghiGustave Roussy, Département de pathologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Aicha Ben LahkdarSCM Bichat, Paris, France.
Nizard LabaiedGustave Roussy, Département de pathologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Moira RagazziPathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marie-Christine MathieuGustave Roussy, Département de pathologie, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · ITUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew generation ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy allows the ex vivo intraoperative analysis of fresh tissue. The High resolution Imaging for Breast carcInoma detection in ex vivo Specimens after breast Conserving sUrgery by hiStolog Scanner (HIBISCUSS) project aimed to develop an online learning program to recognize the main breast tissue features on ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy images and to evaluate the performance of surgeons and pathologists in diagnosing cancerous and non-cancerous breast tissue in ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy images.

methodsPatients who underwent conservative surgery or mastectomy for breast carcinoma (invasive or in situ lesions) were included. The fresh specimens were stained with a fluorescent dye and imaged using a large field-of-view (20 cm2) ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscope.

resultsOne hundred and eighty-one patients were included. The images from 55 patients were annotated to generate learning sheets and images from 126 patients were blindly interpreted by seven surgeons and two pathologists. The time for tissue processing and ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy imaging was between 8 and 10 min. The training program was composed of 110 images divided into nine learning sessions. The final database for blind performance assessment comprised 300 images. The mean duration for one training session and one performance round was 17 and 27 min respectively. The performance of pathologists was almost perfect with 99.6 per cent (standard deviation (s.d.) 5.4 per cent) accuracy. Surgeons' accuracy significantly increased (P = 0.001) from 83 per cent (s.d. 8.4 per cent) in round 1 to 98 per cent (s.d. 4.1 per cent) in round 7 as well as the sensitivity (P = 0.004). Specificity increased without significance from 84 per cent (s.d. 16.7 per cent) in round 1 to 87 per cent (s.d. 16.4 per cent) in round 7 (P = 0.060).

conclusionPathologists and surgeons showed a short learning curve in differentiating breast cancer from non-cancerous tissue in ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy images. Performance assessment for both specialties supports ultra-fast fluorescence confocal microscopy evaluation for intraoperative management. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04976556 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID37178160
PMCPMC10182737
OpenAlexW4376503785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.