ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2023
Machine learning-based mRNA signature in early acute myocardial infarction patients: the perspective toward immunological, predictive, and personalized.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell type heterogeneity in gene co-expression networks: implications for toxicological research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Identification of prognostic and diagnostic signatures for cancer and acute myocardial infarction: multi-omics approaches for deciphering heterogeneity to enhance patient management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are at continued risk of experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aims to unravel the pivotal biomarkers and dynamic immune cell changes, from an immunological, predictive, and personalized viewpoint, by implementing a machine-learning approach and a composite bioinformatics strategy. Peripheral blood mRNA data from different datasets were analyzed, and CIBERSORT was used for deconvoluting human immune cell subtype expression matrices. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) in single-cell and bulk transcriptome levels was conducted to explore possible biomarkers for AMI, with a particular emphasis on examining monocytes and their involvement in cell-cell communication. Unsupervised cluster analysis was performed to categorize AMI patients into different subtypes, and machine learning methods were employed to construct a comprehensive diagnostic model to predict the occurrence of early AMI. Finally, RT-qPCR on peripheral blood samples collected from patients validated the clinical utility of the machine learning-based mRNA signature and hub biomarkers. The study identified potential biomarkers for early AMI, including CLEC2D, TCN2, and CCR1, and found that monocytes may play a vital role in AMI samples. Differential analysis revealed that CCR1 and TCN2 exhibited elevated expression levels in early AMI compared to stable CAD. Machine learning methods showed that the glmBoost+Enet [alpha=0.9] model achieved high predictive accuracy in the training set, external validation sets, and clinical samples in our hospital. The study provided comprehensive insights into potential biomarkers and immune cell populations involved in the pathogenesis of early AMI. The identified biomarkers and the constructed comprehensive diagnostic model hold great promise for predicting the occurrence of early AMI and can serve as auxiliary diagnostic or predictive biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.