Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37178003›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

MBROLE3: improved functional enrichment of chemical compounds for metabolomics data analysis.

Javier Lopez-Ibañez, Florencio Pazos, Monica Chagoyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Adverse Effects of Carbon Black Nanoparticles on Maternal and Fetal Lungs in Pregnant Mice: Insights From a Metabolomics Perspective.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javier Lopez-IbañezComputational Systems Biology Group, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Florencio PazosComputational Systems Biology Group, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-6226
Monica ChagoyenComputational Systems Biology Group, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6911-1591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MBROLE (Metabolites Biological Role) facilitates the biological interpretation of metabolomics experiments. It performs enrichment analysis of a set of chemical compounds through statistical analysis of annotations from several databases. The original MBROLE server was released in 2011 and, since then, different groups worldwide have used it to analyze metabolomics experiments from a variety of organisms. Here we present the latest version of the system, MBROLE3, accessible at http://csbg.cnb.csic.es/mbrole3. This new version contains updated annotations from previously included databases as well as a wide variety of new functional annotations, such as additional pathway databases and Gene Ontology terms. Of special relevance is the inclusion of a new category of annotations, 'indirect annotations', extracted from the scientific literature and from curated chemical-protein associations. The latter allows to analyze enriched annotations of the proteins known to interact with the set of chemical compounds of interest. Results are provided in the form of interactive tables, formatted data to download, and graphical plots.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsProteinsSoftwareDatabases, FactualGene OntologyProteins

Identifiers

PMID37178003
PMCPMC10320153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.