ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Defect Inspection Using Modified YoloV4 on a Stitched Image of a Spinning Tool.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on Safety Helmet Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLOv5s.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Industry 4.0, automation is a critical requirement for mechanical production. This study proposes a computer vision-based method to capture images of rotating tools and detect defects without the need to stop the machine in question. The study uses frontal lighting to capture images of the rotating tools and employs scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) to identify features of the tool images. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) is then used to obtain homography information, allowing us to stitch the images together. The modified YOLOv4 algorithm is then applied to the stitched image to detect any surface defects on the tool. The entire tool image is divided into multiple patch images, and each patch image is detected separately. The results show that the modified YOLOv4 algorithm has a recall rate of 98.7% and a precision rate of 97.3%, and the defect detection process takes approximately 7.6 s to complete for each stitched image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.