Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37177643›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting DDoS Attacks in Software-Defined Networking.

Abdullah Ahmed Bahashwan, Mohammed Anbar, Selvakumar Manickam, Taief Alaa Al-Amiedy, Mohammad Adnan Aladaileh, Iznan H Hasbullah

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abdullah Ahmed BahashwanNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2307-6302
Mohammed AnbarNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-6408
Selvakumar ManickamNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-1954
Taief Alaa Al-AmiedyNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-1404
Mohammad Adnan AladailehNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-3509
Iznan H HasbullahNational Advanced IPv6 Centre (NAv6), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2275-3201
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

This work is supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme with project Code: FRGS/1/2022/ICT11/USM/02/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Software-defined networking (SDN) is a revolutionary innovation in network technology with many desirable features, including flexibility and manageability. Despite those advantages, SDN is vulnerable to distributed denial of service (DDoS), which constitutes a significant threat due to its impact on the SDN network. Despite many security approaches to detect DDoS attacks, it remains an open research challenge. Therefore, this study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) to systematically investigate and critically analyze the existing DDoS attack approaches based on machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), or hybrid approaches published between 2014 and 2022. We followed a predefined SLR protocol in two stages on eight online databases to comprehensively cover relevant studies. The two stages involve automatic and manual searching, resulting in 70 studies being identified as definitive primary studies. The trend indicates that the number of studies on SDN DDoS attacks has increased dramatically in the last few years. The analysis showed that the existing detection approaches primarily utilize ensemble, hybrid, and single ML-DL. Private synthetic datasets, followed by unrealistic datasets, are the most frequently used to evaluate those approaches. In addition, the review argues that the limited literature studies demand additional focus on resolving the remaining challenges and open issues stated in this SLR.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)distributed denial of service (DDoS)intrusion detection system (IDS)machine learning (ML)software-defined networking (SDN)systematic literature review (SLR)

Identifiers

PMID37177643
PMCPMC10181661
OpenAlexW4367624273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.