Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37177573›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Adaptive Optical Closed-Loop Control Based on the Single-Dimensional Perturbation Descent Algorithm.

Bo Chen, Yilin Zhou, Zhaoyi Li, Jingjing Jia, Yirui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bo ChenLaser Tangshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Testing and Control Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, No. 21, Bohai Road, Tangshan 063210, China.
Yilin ZhouLaser Tangshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Testing and Control Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, No. 21, Bohai Road, Tangshan 063210, China.
Zhaoyi LiLaser Tangshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Testing and Control Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, No. 21, Bohai Road, Tangshan 063210, China.
Jingjing JiaLaser Tangshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Testing and Control Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, No. 21, Bohai Road, Tangshan 063210, China.
Yirui ZhangLaser Tangshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Testing and Control Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, No. 21, Bohai Road, Tangshan 063210, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China No.F2019209443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modal-free optimization algorithms do not require specific mathematical models, and they, along with their other benefits, have great application potential in adaptive optics. In this study, two different algorithms, the single-dimensional perturbation descent algorithm (SDPD) and the second-order stochastic parallel gradient descent algorithm (2SPGD), are proposed for wavefront sensorless adaptive optics, and a theoretical analysis of the algorithms' convergence rates is presented. The results demonstrate that the single-dimensional perturbation descent algorithm outperforms the stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) and 2SPGD algorithms in terms of convergence speed. Then, a 32-unit deformable mirror is constructed as the wavefront corrector, and the SPGD, single-dimensional perturbation descent, and 2SPSA algorithms are used in an adaptive optics numerical simulation model of the wavefront controller. Similarly, a 39-unit deformable mirror is constructed as the wavefront controller, and the SPGD and single-dimensional perturbation descent algorithms are used in an adaptive optics experimental verification device of the wavefront controller. The outcomes demonstrate that the convergence speed of the algorithm developed in this paper is more than twice as fast as that of the SPGD and 2SPGD algorithms, and the convergence accuracy of the algorithm is 4% better than that of the SPGD algorithm.

Indexed as

adaptive opticsSPGDwavefront sensorless

Identifiers

PMID37177573
PMCPMC10181763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.