ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Q-Learning-Based Pending Zone Adjustment for Proximity Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a Q-learning-based pending zone adjustment for received signal strength indicator (RSSI)-based proximity classification (QPZA). QPZA aims to improve the accuracy of RSSI-based proximity classification by adaptively adjusting the size of the pending zone, taking into account changes in the surrounding environment. The pending zone refers to an area in which the previous result of proximity classification is maintained and is expressed as a near boundary and a far boundary. QPZA uses Q-learning to expand the size of the pending zone when the noise level increases and reduce it otherwise. Specifically, it calculates the noise level using the estimation error of a device deployed at a specific location. Then, QPZA adjusts the near boundary and far boundary separately by inputting the noise level into the near and far boundary adjusters, consisting of the Q-learning agent and reward calculator. The Q-learning agent determines the next boundary using the Q-table, and the reward calculator calculates the reward using the noise level. QPZA updates the Q-table of the Q-learning agent using the reward. To evaluate the performance of QPZA, we conducted an experimental implementation and compared the accuracy of QPZA with that of the existing approach. The results showed that QPZA achieves 11.69% higher accuracy compared to the existing approach, on average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.