ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Re-Evaluation Method by Index Finger Position in the Face Area Using Face Part Position Criterion for Sign Language Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Several researchers have proposed systems with high recognition rates for sign language recognition. Recently, there has also been an increase in research that uses multiple recognition methods and further fuses their results to improve recognition rates. The most recent of these studies, skeleton aware multi-modal SLR (SAM-SLR), achieved a recognition rate of 98.00% on the RGB video of the Turkish Sign Language dataset AUTSL. We investigated the unrecognized parts of this dataset and found that some signs where the fingers touch parts of the face were not correctly recognized. The proposed method is as follows: First, those with slight differences in top-1 and top-2 evaluation values in the SAM-SLR recognition results are extracted and re-evaluated. Then, we created heatmaps of the coordinates of the index finger in one-handed sign language in the face region of the recognition result in the top-1 to top-3 training data of the candidates based on the face part criteria, respectively. In addition, we extracted four index finger positions from the test data where the index finger stayed longer and obtained the product of the heatmap values of these positions. The highest value among them was used as the result of the re-evaluation. Finally, three evaluation methods were used: the absolute and relative evaluation with two heatmaps and an evaluation method integrating the absolute and relative evaluation results. As a result of applying the proposed method to the SAM-SLR and the previously proposed model, respectively, the best method achieved 98.24% for the highest recognition rate, an improvement of 0.30 points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.