ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Microbiological Quality Estimation of Meat Using Deep CNNs on Embedded Hardware Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative Technologies Reshaping Meat Industrialization: Challenges and Opportunities in the Intelligent Era.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spectroscopic sensor imaging of food samples meta-processed by deep machine learning models can be used to assess the quality of the sample. This article presents an architecture for estimating microbial populations in meat samples using multispectral imaging and deep convolutional neural networks. The deep learning models operate on embedded platforms and not offline on a separate computer or a cloud server. Different storage conditions of the meat samples were used, and various deep learning models and embedded platforms were evaluated. In addition, the hardware boards were evaluated in terms of latency, throughput, efficiency and value on different data pre-processing and imaging-type setups. The experimental results showed the advantage of the XavierNX platform in terms of latency and throughput and the advantage of Nano and RP4 in terms of efficiency and value, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.