SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Algorithms and Techniques for the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adversarial Machine Learning in Industrial IoT: A Systematic Review of Attack Realism, Defense Trade-Offs, and Deployment Gaps.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Supervised and Unsupervised AI-Driven Structural Health Monitoring Framework for Additively Manufactured Metal Components.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Influence of Normalisation Procedures on a Negative Selection Algorithm to Enhance Damage Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of Infill Density in Impact Localization for Additively Manufactured Structures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TinyML in Industrial IoT: A Systematic Review of Applications, System Components, and Methodologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Phase-Change Memory in Edge Computing and Analog In-Memory Computing: An Overview of Recent Research Contributions and Future Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multilayer Structure Damage Detection Using Optical Fiber Acoustic Sensing and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Image-Based Concrete Crack Detection Method Using the Median Absolute Deviation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges Using Wireless Sensor Networks: A Systematic Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are used to analyze the health of infrastructures such as bridges, using data from various types of sensors. While SHM systems consist of various stages, feature extraction and pattern recognition steps are the most important. Consequently, signal processing techniques in the feature extraction stage and machine learning algorithms in the pattern recognition stage play an effective role in analyzing the health of bridges. In other words, there exists a plethora of signal processing techniques and machine learning algorithms, and the selection of the appropriate technique/algorithm is guided by the limitations of each technique/algorithm. The selection also depends on the requirements of SHM in terms of damage identification level and operating conditions. This has provided the motivation to conduct a Systematic literature review (SLR) of feature extraction techniques and pattern recognition algorithms for the structural health monitoring of bridges. The existing literature reviews describe the current trends in the field with different focus aspects. However, a systematic literature review that presents an in-depth comparative study of different applications of machine learning algorithms in the field of SHM of bridges does not exist. Furthermore, there is a lack of analytical studies that investigate the SHM systems in terms of several design considerations including feature extraction techniques, analytical approaches (classification/ regression), operational functionality levels (diagnosis/prognosis) and system implementation techniques (data-driven/model-based). Consequently, this paper identifies 45 recent research practices (during 2016-2023), pertaining to feature extraction techniques and pattern recognition algorithms in SHM for bridges through an SLR process. First, the identified research studies are classified into three different categories: supervised learning algorithms, neural networks and a combination of both. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of various machine learning algorithms is performed in each category. Moreover, the analysis of selected research studies (total = 45) in terms of feature extraction techniques is made, and 25 different techniques are identified. Furthermore, this article also explores other design considerations like analytical approaches in the pattern recognition process, operational functionality and system implementation. It is expected that the outcomes of this research may facilitate the researchers and practitioners of the domain during the selection of appropriate feature extraction techniques, machine learning algorithms and other design considerations according to the SHM system requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.