Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37177389›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Powder Bed Monitoring Using Semantic Image Segmentation to Detect Failures during 3D Metal Printing.

Anna-Maria Schmitt, Christian Sauer, Dennis Höfflin, Andreas Schiffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna-Maria SchmittInstitute Digital Engineering (IDEE), Technical University of Applied Sciences, Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Ignaz-Schön-Strasse 11, 97421 Schweinfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2256-0741
Christian SauerInstitute Digital Engineering (IDEE), Technical University of Applied Sciences, Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Ignaz-Schön-Strasse 11, 97421 Schweinfurt, Germany.
Dennis HöfflinInstitute Digital Engineering (IDEE), Technical University of Applied Sciences, Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Ignaz-Schön-Strasse 11, 97421 Schweinfurt, Germany.
Andreas SchifflerInstitute Digital Engineering (IDEE), Technical University of Applied Sciences, Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Ignaz-Schön-Strasse 11, 97421 Schweinfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-7331

Funding

Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology 41-6562b/25/2-VAL-2103-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) process is an important task within the scope of quality assurance. This article presents a method to gain insights into process quality by comparing the actual and target layers. Images of the powder bed were captured and segmented using an Xception-style neural network to predict the powder and part areas. The segmentation result of every layer is compared to the reference layer regarding the area, centroids, and normalized area difference of each part. To evaluate the method, a print job with three parts was chosen where one of them broke off and another one had thermal deformations. The calculated metrics are useful for detecting if a part is damaged or for identifying thermal distortions. The method introduced by this work can be used to monitor the metal AM process for quality assurance. Due to the limited camera resolutions and inconsistent lighting conditions, the approach has some limitations, which are discussed at the end.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingin situ monitoringmetal printingneural networksemantic segmentationthermal distortion

Identifiers

PMID37177389
PMCPMC10181250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.